Well-Nestedness Properly Subsumes Strict Derivational Minimalism
نویسندگان
چکیده
Minimalist grammars (MGs) constitute a mildly contextsensitive formalism when being equipped with a particular locality condition (LC), the shortest move condition. In this format MGs define the same class of derivable string languages as multiple context-free grammars (MCFGs). Adding another LC to MGs, the specifier island condition (SPIC), results in a proper subclass of derivable languages. It is rather straightforward to see this class is embedded within the class of languages derivable by some well-nested MCFG (MCFGwn). In this paper we show that the embedding is even proper. We partially do so adapting the methods used in [13] to characterize the separation of MCFGwn-languages from MCFG-languages by means of a “simple copying” theorem. The separation of strict derivational minimalism from well-nested MCFGs is then characterized by means of a “simple reverse copying” theorem. Since for MGs, well-nestedness seems to be a rather ad hoc restriction, whereas for MCFGs, this holds regarding the SPIC, our result may suggest we are concerned here with a structural difference between MGs and MCFGs which cannot immediately be overcome in a non-stipulated manner.
منابع مشابه
Observations on Strict Derivational Minimalism
Deviating from the definition originally presented in [12], Stabler [13] introduced— inspired by some recent proposals in terms of a minimalist approach to transformational syntax—a (revised) type of a minimalist grammar (MG) as well as a certain type of a strict minimalist grammar (SMG). These two types can be shown to determine the same class of derivable string languages.
متن کاملAn Additional Observation on Strict Derivational Minimalism
We answer a question which, so far, was left an open problem: does— in terms of derivable string languages—the type of a minimalist grammar (MG) as originally introduced in Stabler 1997 defines a proper superclass of the revised type of an MG and, therefore, the type of a strict MG both introduced in Stabler 1999, and known to be weakly equivalent? For both the revised as well as the strict MG-...
متن کاملMovement and Derivation: Eliminating the PBC
Downward movement and sideward movement necessarily leave a trace that is not c-commanded by the head of the chain and hence violate the PBC. Under a strict interpretation of the PBC, head movement is also banned because the head of the chain in head movement cannot c-command its trace. Likewise, remnant movement would be never permissible, because it leaves an unbound trace within a remnant ca...
متن کاملDerivational Minimalism Is Mildly Context-Sensitive
The change within the linguistic framework of transformational grammar from GB–theory to minimalism brought up a particular type of formal grammar, as well. We show that this type of a minimalist grammar (MG) constitutes a subclass of mildly context–sensitive grammars in the sense that for each MG there is a weakly equivalent linear context–free rewriting system (LCFRS). Moreover, an infinite h...
متن کامل